If your research is buried in static decks, outdated folders, or tools no one opens, you’re not alone.
A centralized hub for research data can solve this problem by consolidating insights, feedback, and findings in one accessible place.
Enterprise UX teams like yours are under pressure to deliver insights that guide product and strategy. But too often, the work gets lost before it can drive real impact.
We’ll compare the leading UX research repository tools of 2025 so you can find one your team will actually use. One that helps your insights reach the people (product managers, designers, marketers, and executives) who need them without extra effort.
The tools you choose shape how your organization sees and uses research. And in large, fast-moving teams, visibility makes all the difference.
UX research is growing, but unfortunately, visibility isn’t growing with it.
If your research lives in disconnected folders, static PDFs, or a tool nobody logs into, the impact dies in the dark. Those great insights of yours are only as valuable as their discoverability.
A research repository can disseminate research by making insights accessible and usable across the organization, empowering all stakeholders to leverage research findings.
That’s why it’s crucial to consolidate all your research data -qualitative and quantitative- in one accessible place, so teams can easily find and leverage every insight.
These are the pain points we hear often, and they reveal what’s really holding research back:
The right UX research repository does more than store findings. It creates a system of insight, making it easy to discover, share, and use research across the organization.
We built Stravito to help teams socialize insights, not just archive them, because we know that research isn’t valuable unless it’s used.
Adoption is the real differentiator. The most effective tools don’t just house insights; they turn them into action by making them easy to find, share, and apply across teams.
We’ve found the top UX research repository tools for 2025, and we’ll talk about who they’re for, how they work, and where they shine.
Each research repository tool we found supports different workflows, priorities, and team sizes.
Using a specialized tool or a dedicated tool designed for research repositories can streamline organization, improve efficiency, and facilitate cross-team collaboration compared to general-purpose platforms.
These tools help teams manage and organize research projects efficiently. Whether you’re looking for an effective research repository tool to boost visibility or simplify synthesis, here’s where to start.
Stravito is an insights repository built for large organizations that need to centralize, curate, and socialize research across teams and markets. Unlike generic research repository software, Stravito is purpose-built for adoption, so insights are seen, shared, and actioned.
Stravito brings all your research into one place, making it easy to access, integrate, and apply insights across the business. With powerful search and AI features, your work doesn’t sit idle. It drives action.
Best for: UX, Insights, and Strategy teams in large organizations (global or regional)
Key strengths:
Limitations: Not designed for in-platform analysis or video coding workflows
Use case: Ideal for teams that want to:
Dovetail is a well-known user research repository tool that helps researchers analyze qualitative data and create highlight reels.
It’s commonly used by product and design teams for centralized ux research repositories, and is particularly useful for analyzing and synthesizing user interviews.
Best for: Mid-sized product teams and researchers focused on interview analysis
Key strengths:
Limitations: Limited stakeholder engagement and discoverability outside of research
Use case: Great for qualitative ux insights repository use, but often needs a second layer to drive adoption
Condens offers a lightweight ux research repository software with features for synthesis, tagging, and some access controls. It makes it easy to tag data for efficient retrieval and analysis, helping teams organize and categorize research insights. Popular with teams that want a simple UI without complex onboarding.
Best for: Growing UXR teams without heavy IT resources
Key strengths:
Limitations: Fewer integrations and limited support for cross-functional access
Use case: Best for research-first teams building their first user research repository
EnjoyHQ (now integrated with UserZoom) is a research repository software combining UX research data management with usability testing features.
It’s designed for centralizing customer feedback and insights from multiple sources, helping teams manage research materials such as interview transcripts, usability test results, and survey responses.
Best for: Teams that want a combined UX research software and repository platform
Key strengths:
Limitations: Platform changes post-acquisition have affected stability and UX
Use case: Suitable for companies wanting to consolidate UX and VoC in one place
Aurelius is a purpose-built ux research repository that focuses on turning raw data into organized insights. It’s designed for research analysis and data synthesis, making it easy for teams to analyze data, tag, group, and turn findings into themes quickly.
Best for: UX teams focused on thematic analysis and centralized documentation
Key strengths:
Limitations: Limited stakeholder-facing features; fewer enterprise integrations
Use case: Ideal for researchers who need a clear audit trail of findings and want to build a growing UX research library
Great Question is a user research platform that combines recruitment, research, and repository features in one place. It’s a newer entrant in the UX research tools space with a lightweight user research repository built in.
Best for: Startups and scaleups that want one tool for participant recruitment, interviews, and synthesis
Key strengths:
Limitations: Less robust than dedicated research repository software
Use case: Good for lean UXR teams who want to simplify their stack and keep everything under one roof
Looppanel offers fast, AI-assisted synthesis for interviews and usability testing. Its user research repository tools are geared toward teams who want quick turnaround and shareable summaries, and are designed to extract and share specific insights from research data.
Best for: UX researchers working on usability studies and high-volume interviews
Key strengths:
Limitations: Not ideal for long-form reports or global permissions
Use case: Best for teams who prioritize speed over long-term archival in their ux research repository
Delve is a UX research software focused on qualitative analysis and deep coding. It supports atomic research by breaking down data into small, reusable insights, enabling organized and efficient knowledge sharing. It’s a strong choice for academic-style rigor in professional UXR settings.
Best for: Researchers doing in-depth interview analysis or grounded theory work
Key strengths:
Limitations: Less intuitive for non-researchers; limited stakeholder sharing features
Use case: Best for research teams prioritizing rigor over reach
UserBit is a structured user research repository tool for qualitative research and analysis. It offers clear workflows for turning notes, interviews, and observations into themes and insights, and supports collaboration among multiple stakeholders across teams.
Best for: UX teams looking for clarity, structure, and traceability in their research
Key strengths:
Limitations: UI can feel dated; limited enterprise support
Use case: Great for researchers who need a detailed paper trail and structured synthesis
Notion isn’t a research repository tool by design, but many UX teams try to make it one. With endless customization options, it’s often used as a DIY ux research repository or UX research library. Notion can be used to store data, but it lacks advanced research-specific features found in dedicated tools.
Best for: Small, scrappy teams that need flexibility and have time to manage a system manually
Key strengths:
Limitations:
Use case: A good stopgap or internal wiki, but not purpose-built for research
Confluence is another widely used workaround, often serving as a default research repository in Atlassian-heavy orgs. It offers documentation capabilities but lacks features tailored to research workflows.
Best for: Teams already deeply embedded in Atlassian’s ecosystem
Key strengths:
Limitations: Lacks research-specific structure, discoverability, or stakeholder engagement tools
Use case: Confluence allows teams to save research documents and research reports for future reference. Better suited as an engineering knowledge base than a dedicated ux research insights repository.
Airtable is another flexible tool that teams often turn into a research repository. It is not built specifically for research, but can be configured to act as a lightweight ux research repository tool.
Airtable can also be used for data analysis in research projects, allowing teams to process and interpret their findings efficiently.
Best for: Teams with strong ops skills and the time to maintain a custom system
Key strengths:
Limitations: No native research workflows, tagging standards, or synthesis features
Use case: A build-it-yourself option that works well if maintained, but may not scale with complexity
Figma isn’t exactly a research repository. However, some teams use community-built UX templates to manage study plans and share findings on the platform, essentially building a manual UX research repository example inside a design tool.
These Figma templates are often managed by a UX researcher or a dedicated team member, ensuring research data is organized and accessible as the team grows.
Best for: Design-forward teams already living in Figma
Key strengths:
Limitations: No tagging, search, or archival capabilities
Use case: Best for smaller design teams or as a short-term solution for ux research library needs
These aren’t user experience research tools in the traditional sense. However, some teams use Kanban-style tools like Trello or Jira to track studies, ongoing research efforts, and existing research by tagging findings and organizing previous work.
Best for: Teams already using Trello/Jira for project management
Key strengths:
Limitations: Not designed for research; no synthesis, access control, or search
Use case: Good for visibility in scrappy setups, but limited as a long-term research repository UX solution
Still the default for many enterprises, these storage tools are often used as makeshift research repository tools. They’re familiar but rarely effective. These tools can be used to store user data and all the data related to research, but they lack advanced research management features.
Best for: Teams that need to centralize documents quickly without adding new tools
Key strengths:
Limitations: No tagging, synthesis, or search across insight formats
Use case: Useful for basic storage, but not for creating an effective research repository tool that supports usage.
Now you have a better idea of what is available. But you know, tools alone don’t solve the problem.
Choosing the right research repository tool means matching features to real-world friction: visibility gaps, stakeholder access, and team workflows.
Let’s walk through how to evaluate your options based on what actually moves the needle.
No two teams have the same challenges. That’s why choosing the best UX research repository isn’t just about features, it’s about fit.
A structured research process is essential when selecting a tool, as it ensures consistent and effective user insights gathering and integration into your workflows.
Use this step-by-step checklist to guide your selection process.
What are you really trying to fix?
Once you've clarified your core job to be done, the next step is to ensure that the right people can access and use the research.
The most effective research repository tools make research usable beyond your team. Ask:
Knowledge sharing is essential for organizational impact, as it ensures that UX research insights are distributed across teams and accessible to all stakeholders.
If your user research repository can’t support the people making decisions, it’s not working.
Check what types of research you’ll need to upload and organize. A good UX research repository should handle:
This is where general software tools for user experience research often fall short.
Your ux research insights repository should support the flow of information, not just its storage. Key questions:
Built-in socialization features help democratize research by making insights accessible and usable across the organization, so everyone can benefit from research findings.
A repository that sits idle is just a graveyard of past projects.
Enterprise teams need serious control and flexibility.
Whether you’re centralizing research after a reorg or expanding globally, your insights repository should grow with you.
If you’ve made it this far, one thing’s clear: the stakes are high. And not every ux research repository tool is built to meet the demands of an enterprise team.
That’s where Stravito stands out.
Stravito is designed for UX and insights teams working at enterprise scale who need to deliver research that gets seen, used, and acted on.
As a good research repository, Stravito supports a user-centered approach by centralizing research data, including user research data, enabling user-centric decisions, and making it easy to share knowledge across teams.
AI-powered tagging, synthesis, and collections help insights travel across teams without extra manual effort.
Weekly digests, curated libraries, and intuitive search make it easy for stakeholders to find and apply what matters.
Your business can discover and action research that matters to them, all from a single, centralized platform
Out-of-the-box deployment. SOC2 and GDPR compliance. Role-based access and multilingual support from day one.
Usage analytics and engagement tools show who is using your research and how it’s driving decisions across the organization..
Adoption comes built in, with a UX that works for researchers and business users alike.
Teams like Delta are already using Stravito to democratize insights across departments—from inflight entertainment to onboarding design.
“It’s like our own personal Spotify for research and insights.”
Kate Rouse DuHadway, Project Manager, Consumer Research & Insight at Delta.
With the Delta Insights Hub, stakeholders now have instant access to years of customer feedback, fueling faster, more informed decisions across the entire customer journey.
Book a demo to see how other enterprise teams like yours are making research more visible, accessible, and used.
Insights only create impact when they’re easy to find, understand, and act on. That requires more than storage. It requires a system built for visibility.
Encourage your team to use your repository not only to store insights, but also to build on further research and deepen organizational knowledge.
If your UXR team is focused on making research matter in 2025, Stravito is the one to watch.
Book a personalized Stravito demo and turn your UX research into a strategic asset.